beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.07.04 2012가합2952 (1)

건물명도

Text

1. All applications for interventions by independent parties shall be dismissed;

2. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Progress 1: around 199 2.3, the Plaintiff: around 199 2.3, 205 - 36.46 - 36 - 5 - 36 - 46 - 97 - 36 - 47 - 97 - 47 - 97 - 97 - 97 - 24 - 97 - 97 - 24 - 97 - 97 - 24 - 97 - 97 - 29 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -6 -4 -4 -7 -2 9 -4 -4 -2 9 -4 -4 -2 97 -4 -4 -2 9 -4 -2 9 -4 -4 -2 9 -2 -4 -4 ;

The provisional use approval period from September 21, 2006 to December 30, 2007 is "the first provisional use approval period".

(A) At the time of (No. 54-1) 3, the Plaintiff was required to obtain a resolution from the Traffic Impact Assessment Deliberation Committee as one of the procedures for obtaining approval for the use of the previous complex history.

On December 16, 2006, the Plaintiff received a traffic impact assessment document from the Gu and Si, and was demanded from the Gu and Si to submit the following data until December 18, 2006:

(A) (No. 44) ① Specific business contents for commercial facilities. ② Change drawings indicating detailed use of commercial facilities. ③ Future promotion plans (the selection of business operators) are held on April 30, 2007, such as a development plan for underground parking lots in squares, etc. < Amended by Act No. 837, Apr. 30, 2007>