However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Category D summary;

At the main point, the Defendant, at around 22:10 on July 14, 2014, shall be subject to the execution of official duties, and shall be subject to the execution of official duties, and shall be subject to the execution of official duties.

It does not pay the drinking value within the week and imposes a penalty for the time without paying the drinking value.

On the same day, at around 23:10, Jinjin Police Station G District Assistant H was dispatched to the above main points after receiving 112 reports.

피고인은 위 H이 피고인의 행위를 제지하자 H에게 “너는 돈 쳐 먹고 여기 왔냐.”라고 말하며 발로 H의 이마 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

2. In the G District, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, abused police officers and arrested flagrant offenders. On July 14, 2014, around 23:15, he/she was transferred to the G District in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City I.

In the above G District, the Defendant stated that the said G District Ha was a slope belonging to the said G District Ha, “The hand knife, who is a hand knife, changed to a hand knife.” In order that the above H caused the Defendant’s knife, the Defendant knife and knife a part of the above H knife in the future.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crimes, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Although the nature of the crime in this case is not weak in light of the background, method, frequency, etc. of the crime in this case that interferes with police officers in charge of the arrest of flagrant offenders and the investigation of criminal reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., the defendant has the same criminal power.