However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 20, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on November 20, 2006, and a fine of three hundred and five hundred and fifty thousand won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on September 28, 201.

1. On April 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol on April 21, 2016 at around 00:50, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.15%, the Defendant again driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by driving approximately 100 meters of a fright learning vehicle in front of the Taedong-dong community service center located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu. 45 meters.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the injured Defendant confirmed the Defendant’s drinking by drinking alcohol to the victim D (25 years old) who was a policeman belonging to the police station C District of Ulsan-gu Police Station C District of the Ulsan-do, who was called out after receiving 112 reports on the above facts at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and confirmed that the Defendant was drinking. The Defendant asked the Defendant as to whether he was driving under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was asked as to whether he was driving under the influence of alcohol;

The death shall be dead.

” 고 큰소리치면서 발로 피해자의 오른쪽 허벅지와 팔 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the victim's criminal investigation, and at the same time, caused buckbucks which require the victim to receive treatment for about two weeks.

3. The Defendant detrimental to public goods is arrested in a flagrant offender at the time, place, and place described in paragraph 1, with interference with the performance of official duties as described in paragraph 2, and is on board the back seat of the E rocketing patrolr and has moved to the C;

C. The death of the deceased.

“In great attention, the patrol cars used by public offices by breaking back the back glass of the patrol cars at hand, thereby impairing the repair cost of 244,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. The situation report on the driving of a driver and the driver of a driver’s office.