When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 12:55 on December 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from D, the proprietor of the plant where the Defendant was engaged in the business, and (b) investigated the details of the damage, while the police officer F, who belongs to the police police box in the Syang Police Station Emb, who was called out, and the police officer G, conducted the investigation of the damage; (c) while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) took a breath of the police breath; (b) took the breath of the breath; (c) f, according to the process of taking the outside and photographing the outside; and (d) f, carried the f’s chest part by hand; and (c) f, carried the external part of the breath of the breath; and (d) pushed the shoulder.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen by capturing a video to the same area;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the one-time fine for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, shall be determined as ordered in light of the following factors: