2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

While the Defendant was engaged in the export business of Da employee and the mobile phone from the Seoul Central Franc-gu C2 to Vietnam on his/her behalf, he/she was requested by the victim E to export one cell phone of 6 mobile phone of 1 million won in the market price of the stolen stolen stolen stolen stolen goods from the victim E, and received the above mobile phone delivery without confirming the personal information of the requester. On March 2015, the Defendant exported the mobile phone from the non-discontested business entity in Vietnam to obtain business profit of 20,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired stolen goods due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement protocol with respect to E and F;

1. Application of the statutes on replies, such as details of use of damaged articles;

1. Articles 364 and 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;