However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 19:00 on July 4, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as, under the influence of alcohol at E-cafeteria operated by the victim D (the age of 63) in Daegu-gu, the Defendant, on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol to the customers, who were in his place, brought the victim’s neck by hand, booming the victim’s neck, booming his head, and knishing him.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), and at the above time, and at the above place, reported the Defendant’s above act in 112, the Defendant cited the kitchen knife (24cm in length, approximately 27cm in length, and about 27cm in total), which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen, and said, that the victim’s “welves, kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’ss kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on an on-site movement, such as an act of violence;

1. Bridges and photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper and upper organs;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act that applies to the relevant criminal facts, Article 260 (1) of the choice of punishment, Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury to carry dangerous articles);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that, in light of the fact that the defendant carried a dangerous object and inflicted an injury on a victim, and that the victim did not agree with the victim, the victim’s degree of injury is minor, there is no record of punishment of suspended execution or more since 2006, and the defendant’s age and age.