도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has been punished several times (one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment and four times a fine) due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment and four times a fine) in the past. The sentence of the court below (two years a suspended sentence
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Prosecutor, the Defendant confessions and reflects the fact that the instant crime is simpleless driving, and the Defendant was revoked on or around August 2013 after obtaining a driver’s license, and it is difficult to deem that the Defendant does not repeat again, and the Defendant does not repeat again. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, the background and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and pleadings, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.