공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 2550, the Defendant, at the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station D District District on 16:45 on April 30, 2017, demanded to leave the said District E in the circumstances where he/she works for a religious story for the purpose of Jeondo.
In the indictment, the indictment was required to escape from E in the circumstances in which the said district forces are working in the situation, such as putting the bullying from the church they attend.
Although the witness E’s testimony is written, it is unclear whether the Defendant’s act of leaving the church is prior to being demanded to leave the church from the above E even if the witness E testimony, and therefore, it is recognizable ex officio as above.
The defendant does not respond to this, and he can not call the Dog to go to the Dog, arrest him with a mental disability who has no mental disability, and arrest him, so he may lead to a large number of misunderstandings.
“Along with sound,” the face of the above E, which prevents him/her from carrying a welfare card for persons with disabilities, and was assaulted by the hand, which caused a welfare card for persons with disabilities, such as smuggling of the face of the above E.
The written indictment states that “the above E’s face has a welfare card for persons with disabilities, and assaulted by drinking with his/her face, etc.” However, the witness E states that “the face was sealed with the hand bearing the card,” so ex officio recognition as above.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.
"2017 Highest 3809"
1. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant stolen the victim G by taking advantage of the gaps around the F parking lot in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, where surveillance was neglected, resulting in a theft of the sum of 50,000 won in the market value of the victim G, which is owned by the victim G, and KRW 3 4,500 in addition to KRW 4,50 in the market value.
2. Obstruction of business;
A. The Defendant.