정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a family owner, and the victim B is a horse of D, and the Defendant and the victim were disputes among themselves since March 2014 as a matter of land exchange contract related to the construction of the entrance road of the above D.
At around 10:50 on January 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s house located in the city E Apartment 306 dong 1301 at around 10:50, for the purpose of slandering the victim; (b) connected the above D’s head office to the free bulletin board of the C’s website (F) by means of a computer to “G” and “G”; (c) provided advice as to whether the price is sweed or sweed; (d) it was difficult to see that residents and fightings are frequent; and (e) it was very difficult to believe that they are drinking; (b) it was interested in our land and breathm. At our land. At the same time, the Defendant laid the fence and laid down the entrance at the entrance, laid down the door at the police station, laid down the door, laid down the door into a plastic house, and did not sweed up the fact that the Defendant was sweed down and sweed.
B. At around 08:22 on February 12, 2015, the Defendant, using a computer, posted a letter stating “I” as the title “H” by accessing the free bulletin board on the website of the above C with a view to slandering the victim, using the computer, thereby damaging the reputation of the victim by openly revealing facts through the information and communications network.
2. Determination.