When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, at around 01:20 on December 25, 2014, received alcoholic beverages, etc. equivalent to KRW 13 to KRW 195,00,00 for beer (k) and equivalent to KRW 13 to KRW 195,00 without any intent or ability to pay the price, even though he/she received alcoholic beverages, etc. equivalent to KRW 13 to KRW 195,00,00 for beer and 265,00.

Accordingly, the defendant had taken property benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant is making a confession of the crime of this case in favor of the defendant, or that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine in the past one time for fraud, even though he had been sentenced to a punishment of imprisonment in the form of fraud, the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time. The defendant did not pay the damaged amount to the victim up to now, and the defendant did not use the crime of this case or did not reach an agreement. Considering the sentencing precedent in a similar case, the sentencing precedent in the similar case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the amount of fine specified in the summary order is not excessive, and there is no change in circumstances that can be considered after the summary order, so it is decided