In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

The Defendants thought that Defendant A’s birth, who was the dynamics of Defendant A, was bullying from the same anti-governments, and were able to find them and make them mixed.

1. On April 7, 2015, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) took place within the second and sixth classes of F middle school in Gunsan-si on April 10:20, 2015, Defendant B took the shoulder of the victim G (13 years old) at one time and took the face of the victim G at one time, Defendant A took the face of the victim G at two times from the next side to the victim’s drinking, and Defendant B took the face of the victim H (13 years old) at two times on two occasions on the floor, and Defendant A took the face of the victim H at one time from the next side to the victim’s hand at one time with the victim’s floor, and I coming into the classroom at that time at that time at five times with the victim H’s hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly carried the victim G with the number of days of treatment in an aesthetic eye and the body around the snow, and the Defendants jointly carried out the victim H with I for the number of days of treatment in an aesthetic eye and the body around the snow.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendants: (a) known that the English teachersJ (at the age of 31) of F Middle Schools, a public school, is conducting English classes, opened a classroom entrance with the knowledge of the fact that they are going to do so; (b) assault the students, as described in paragraph 1, to avoid disturbance; and (c) embling them, the Justice set up Defendant A’s arms; and (d) Defendant A b b cryped the J’s hand, and assaulted Defendant B’s hand; and (c) threatened Defendant B with b0 minutes of his English class by taking advantage of the things inside the classroom and threatening them to put them to cry, thereby suspending the English class for about twenty minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the class of public school teachers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. The relevant Article of the Act and the punishment of violence, etc. committed by each of the parties who choose a punishment;