However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A thief: (a) around December 1, 2014, the Defendant stolen the victim’s “Emart” in the “Emart” of the Plaintiff’s D Operation, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, by taking advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected, by taking advantage of the gap in the victim’s surveillance at the display stand, by taking a 2,000 won of the market price.

2. At around 23:00 on December 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) heard the victim’s warning that he would pay an excessive value from the victim G, a police officer belonging to the Hanmi Police Station F District of the Kumi Police Station, which received 112 a report; and (b) there is no money to the above victim’s statement that “I would be able to give and drink the money; (c) there is the same son’s son; (d) there is son’s bitch, son’s bitch, and son’s bitch; and (d) there is a bitch, son’s bitch, and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of G police officer;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the relevant Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act requires a strict punishment in that the defendant assaultss the police officer in uniform to obstruct his/her legitimate performance of official duties, but the defendant is against his/her mistake, the defendant agrees with the thief victim, and the defendant is suspended of execution.