However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendants are in a de facto marital relationship from around 2014.

The Defendants knew that E, a manager of a farm household owned by Dacheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, has leased the above farm house free of charge on condition that he manages the cemetery of the said clan, and they used them to rent it free of charge as if they were to use the said clan cemetery, and sublet it to a third party and use it as a security deposit.

Defendant

A contact with the victim G, who posted a letter on February 19, 2017, stating that he/she seeks a house of a farm household for the purpose of returning to rural communities to the Internet Kaffff, and the Defendants met the victim at around the 19th day of the same month at the residence of the Defendants in the west-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and show the victim’s house and the victim of the said farm household. Defendant A sent money to the victim, “Subject to the management of the cemetery, he/she can live for ten years with the owner of the house,” and the owner shall enter into a contract with the owner of the house.

different types.

There is no defect in sending it to the account.

“False speech” was made to the effect that it was “,” and Defendant B took part in it, thereby making a false statement to the same effect as the victim.

However, around that time, there was a situation where the Defendants were unable to enter into a lease agreement for the above E and the above farming household. The Defendants did not have the right to sublet the above farming household house because they did not obtain the above E consent to sub-lease. Accordingly, even if they received the deposit, they did not have the intent or ability to rent the above farming house to the victims even if they did not receive the deposit.

around February 19, 2017, the Defendants received KRW 10 million in the name of the deposit from the Defendant’s new cooperative account under the name of Defendant B, and received delivery of KRW 500,000 in the name of the deposit on the same account around the 20th of the same month.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the injured party about KRW 10.5 million.