2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable situation where the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case and the amount of fraud is not so large that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant does not have the records of the same crime. The defendant does not have the records of the crime of this case. The crime of this case is a concurrent crime with the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, such as the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., for which the judgment became final and conclusive, and the crime of this case must be judged simultaneously and the equality should be considered, and the defendant's health

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the past record of having been punished several times for this type of crime, and the lower court appears to have sentenced to a fine reduced than the summary order in consideration of the Defendant’s favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances to change the punishment determined by the lower court, and in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, means and consequence, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories of this case, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.