beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.06.19 2012가합8296

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant D’s medical corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) is a foundation that operates the F Hospital located in the city (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant E is a medical specialist in the extracurricular branch working at the Defendant Hospital, and Plaintiff A’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C are children of G.

B. On November 13, 2011, G suffered injuries, such as the upper half of the left gire, the left knee- full-time knee-ray, etc. due to a traffic accident, G received an operation of the Defendant hospital to carry out a fixed-scale operation on the left side metal plate of the upper gire, the diameter of the pipe, the right-hand flag, and the right-hand flag.

C. On November 20, 2012, G: (a) around 10:25, G applied to the Defendant hospital to undergo an operation to remove metal plates fixed on the left upper pelle part of the upper pelle; and (b) undergo an internal climatic surgery (hereinafter “instant operation”); (c) Defendant E applied to G’s doctor in charge of G in charge of spinecination and completed an operation at around 15:35 on the same day.

G At around 21:30 on the same day, the nurse of the defendant hospital took a medical control prescribed by the defendant E by complaining of pains on the part of the surgery. On November 21, 2012, the following day, considering abnormal symptoms, such as pulmonary stresse around 4:50, the doctor on duty performed emergency measures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but died at around 5:30 on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). [Grounds for recognition] A without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. As to Defendant E, the deceased died due to Defendant E’s negligence as follows, Defendant E is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for damages caused by the death of the deceased.

1. Although the instant surgery was not conducted to the extent to which vertebal anesthesia was performed during the instant surgery, the Deceased did not interfere with daily life before the instant surgery, and did not have any disease that was caused by the death, which led to the death after the instant surgery.