Of them, the part on Defendant F is reversed.

Defendant

F shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 months.

, however, the defendant.

A. Defendant A1’s erroneous determination of facts only delivered R’s proposal to B Q, W, etc. and did not lead the crime of the instant manipulation, the lower court determined that the Defendant was involved in the instant manipulation of market price as a package. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) The sentence of imprisonment (two years and four months of imprisonment) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B and F’s punishment (Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and Defendant F: imprisonment with prison labor for ten months) declared by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below on the grounds of appeal by Defendant A. 1 is as follows: (1) A, C, C, C, C, and C, C, C, C, and C, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, and P, P, P, P, P, P, and P, P, P, P, P, P, P, and P, P, P, P, P, 100 5, P, and 1000