beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2021.01.26 2019가단1157

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Plaintiff. The Defendants are entitled to share in the attached Table 2734 square meters among the 2734 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Ulsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 30, 1981, the Plaintiff and DongW completed the registration of transfer of ownership of each of 1/2 shares on the ground of “trade on January 9, 1971, 1971,” with respect to V, Seogjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The net W died on November 19, 1980, and currently owns 1/2 shares in the land of this case, and the Defendants own each share indicated in the column of “total inheritance shares (W 1/2)” in the attached Table of shares.

(c)

Meanwhile, from March 6, 1975 to March 6, 1975, the Plaintiff is growing rice plants in this case’s land.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, barring any other circumstances, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on March 6, 1995 with respect to each share indicated in the column of “total inheritance shares (W 1/2 W 1/2)” in the separate sheet among the land in this case.

3. Determination as to Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P’s assertion, the said Defendants did not purchase one-half of the instant land from the deceased W on March 6, 1975.

However, the claim of this case is a claim for the procedure of registration of transfer of ownership based on the completion of prescription, and such circumstance is not an obstacle to accepting the claim of this case.

Therefore, the above defendants' above assertion is without merit.

4. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.