상해
All appeals are dismissed.
The Defendants’ grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed) are examined together with the Defendants’ grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding the Defendants guilty of all the facts charged of this case (except for the part of innocence against Defendant A) on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on self
Meanwhile, Defendant K’s ground of appeal that there was an error of incomplete deliberation or misapprehension of legal principles as to mental disorder in the judgment below, is not a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal by Defendant K’s ground of appeal that it was not subject to judgment ex officio.
Furthermore, the lower court did not err in its determination as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.