사기
All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal shows that Defendant B confirmed that the gold leader took place, and the victim’s proposal was rejected by the victim’s “a person who is a family member in our house because he did not do so,” and there is a clear circumstance in collusion with E, such as: (a) the victim’s expression “a person who is a family member in our house because he did not want to do so; and (b) converting the yttos into US dollars to find the gold leader.”
Defendant
A also is a person who is difficult to believe that the content of “A lending expenses to bring in gold bars through the UN Secretariat, not through regular customs clearance procedures,” proposed by E, is difficult.
In full view of these circumstances, it is sufficient to find the defendants guilty of the facts charged of this case where they acquired the victim's money in collusion with E.
2. Examining the evidence in light of the records, a thorough examination of the records reveals that the court of first instance found the Defendants not guilty on the grounds that the Defendants conspired with E is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants conspired with E, and there is an error of mistake of facts as otherwise alleged by the prosecutor in the judgment of the court of first instance.
[In full view of all the evidence presented by the prosecutor, the Defendants committed the instant fraud in collusion with E beyond the fact that the Defendants could objectively suspect the crime of fraud, thereby preventing the Defendants from committing the crime of fraud, but did not do so.
3. The prosecutor's appeal is without merit. Thus, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.