사해행위취소
1. As to shares of 2/13 of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet:
A. It was concluded on October 30, 2012 between the Defendant and B.
1. In full view of the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including each number) and the purport of the entire argument as to the results of the fact-finding conducted by the Court Administration in this Court, it is acknowledged that the agreement on division of inherited property concluded on October 30, 2012 between the defendant and B should be revoked as a fraudulent act. Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration under Section 1(b) of the Disposition.
2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.