However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 14, 2016, from around 21:30 on the same day to 22:55 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sought alcohol on the main points of “D” operated by Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B victim C (n, 49 years of age); (b) but, (c) the Defendant was refused by a small victim who made it necessary to avoid disturbance within the place like the transfer, and (d) the Defendant saw that “I would know why I would drink, and why I would know you would drink and drink,” and (d) tried to drink in and out of the main points, with the Defendant’s mind, I tried to take the drinking in the cooling house, and she saw himself, while drinking the victim with a great sound within the scope of customers, and interfered with the victim’s business by force by force for about 30 minutes, such as drinking expenses to customers.

2. At around 22:55 on May 14, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly, by repeating the victim’s desire, such as: (a) the time and place indicated in paragraph (1); (b) and (c) the C and the customers, who are the captain of the above main station of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station Estation, Police Station Estation, sent out after receiving the report 112, to return home from the victim F, the police officer of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station Estation, who was the police officer of the above victim; and (d) the victim’s flasium, “I were the fla

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and F

1. Obstruction of business under Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

(1) Article 311 of the Criminal Act

U.S. Imprisonment

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Interference with Business: Reduction according to the grounds for mitigation [Special Convicted Persons] from June to June (Special Convicted Persons]: January to August (decision of Sentence], the details and extent of violence that was exercised, the circumstances in which the defendant recognized his mistake, and agreed with the victim for obstruction of business.