하자보수에 갈음하는 손해배상 등
Defendant U.S. Co., Ltd. 411,364,618 won and its related amount from December 10, 2014 to February 11, 2015.
Basic Facts
The plaintiff is an autonomous management body organized by occupants pursuant to the Housing Act for the management of A Apartments (hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case") and its ancillary and welfare facilities in Young-gu, Suwon-si.
Defendant Bosan C&C is the contractor of the instant apartment construction and the seller of the instant apartment, and Defendant Hanyang Construction is the construction company that contracted and performed the instant new apartment construction work from Bosan C&C, and Defendant Hanyang Construction is the construction company that contracted and performed the instant apartment construction work. The construction mutual aid association is below.
As stated in paragraph (1), the construction guarantee agency that entered into the warranty contract for the apartment of this case is the construction guarantee agency.
On July 11, 201, when Defendant Hanyang Construction Co., Ltd. and Defendant Hanyang Construction Co., Ltd. fail to perform the obligation to repair the defects incurred in the apartment of this case, the Defendant Hanyang Construction Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with the guarantee creditor (at the time of the Gyeonggi-do Suwon Construction Co., Ltd.) to pay the warranty bond within the scope of the period and amount indicated in the following table (hereinafter “instant warranty bond contract”).
The guarantee coverage amount between July 30, 201 and July 29, 2021: (a) 33,902,117 won from July 30, 201 to July 29, 2011; (b) 33,902,117 won from July 29, 201 to July 30, 2011; (c) Plaintiff 13,902,117 won from July 30, 201 to July 13, 2015; and (d) Plaintiff 1’s council of occupants’ representatives changed the inspection to the market of 206,536,156 won from July 30, 201 to July 30, 201; and (d) Plaintiff 200,700 won from July 29, 201 to July 30, 201; and (e) Plaintiff 23,719,719.
In the construction of the apartment of this case, the defendant Hanyang Construction failed to construct the apartment of this case according to the design drawing, or modified construction or defective construction differently from the design drawing, and accordingly, the apartment of this case is constructed.