도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Violation of restrictions on temporary operation of cargo drivers belonging to the summary order (the Jeonju District Court) subject to the summary order subject to review of the facts charged of each of the facts charged of this case: Violation of restrictions on the operation of cargo drivers at the location of cargo drivers; < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 11783, Nov. 29, 2005; Presidential Decree No. 117083, Nov. 11, 2007>
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005) which is a joint penal provision among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case was invalidated retroactively due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, such as Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38, Oct. 28, 2010.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.