정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. 이 사건 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2012. 6. 7. 01:19경 전주 이하 불상지에서, 피고인 명의의 휴대폰 등을 이용하여 피해자 C(23세)의 휴대폰으로 “C야 안녕 ㅋ 니가 D 묵직한 걸로 날린다고 허세 부리는 지잡 대상이니 ㅎ”라는 내용의 문자메세지를 보내는 등 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 9회에 걸쳐 정보통신망을 통하여 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 문언을 반복적으로 피해자에게 도달하게 하였다.
2. Determination:
A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor Nos. 1 through 3 of the annexed crime sight table, the fact that the defendant sent text messages as stated in this part of the facts charged can be recognized.
However, as to whether the transmission of the above text message constitutes a series of repeated uneasiness creation acts under Article 74(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., this part of the text message sent three times at a time not exceeding two minutes, and the second and third text messages sent continuously at the same time, and it is reasonable to evaluate the whole as a single act in light of the contents of the above text message, etc., it is difficult to view it as a series of repeated uneasiness creation acts.
(2) Article 74(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do5914, Sept. 9, 2010). Therefore, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant sent text messages as indicated in [Attachment] Nos. 1 through 3, thereby creating a series of repeated apprehensions, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
B. C’s evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in this part of the attached list Nos. 4 through 9 is the evidence.