A. On May 12, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Seoul and 102 (hereinafter “instant housing”) with respect to the lease deposit amounting to KRW 40 million and up to May 17, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and paid to the Defendant the deposit amounting to KRW 40 million.

B. Since April 2018, the Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to refuse the renewal of the instant lease to the Defendant, and transferred the instant house to the Defendant by way of having a director in the instant house prior to the expiration of the lease term, and delivering the key to the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on May 17, 2018 due to the expiration date, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 40 million won the lease deposit and the next day after the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff is delivered to the defendant, with 15% interest per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 28, 2018 to the day of full payment.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.