When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 20, 2014, at around 13:30, the Defendant, while drinking at the G Apartment Management Office in Gwangju-si, sent a brush to the employees, such as D, who are the head of the apartment management office, and took a frush at around 15:50 on the same day, again, at the above apartment management office, had the monitors wear the frush of the victim E while carrying a frush to the employees, by cutting the computers and monitors on the brush, thereby impairing the floor by pushing the victims E, damaging the said monitors, destroying the said monitors, and obstructing the duties of the said apartment management office by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the selection of fines).

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;