If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 28, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Victim F, the representative of the E company, from the office of Hancheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., Ltd., 702), “The E company is selected as a contractor in connection with the Incheon Gyeyang-gu G-type reconstruction construction work” was changed to KRW 50 million.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the authority or ability to select the E Company as the re-building construction in the above G-type.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 50 million from the victim as the compensation for the selection of the contractor, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;