A. In fact-finding, the defendant did not face the victim's vehicle, and the defendant asked the victim that he is fine, thus leaving the scene of the accident, so there was no intention of escape.

In addition, the accident of this case did not have an injury to the extent that the victim needs relief measures.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below rejected the above argument in detail under the title of "the judgment on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel" in the judgment of the court below on the same ground as the ground of appeal of this case. The court below rejected the above argument. However, the court below's attitude of the relevant case is the same as the reasoning of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. The defendant's 4th grade of the victim's left hand part of the national school who is the 11th grade child of South Korean school in his own 11 year old and went beyond the ground floor and went beyond the ground floor for about 1 week in this case where the victim's right part of the 5th grade of the 5th grade of the 5th grade of the 1 week medical care can not be distinguished at all, but if the defendant's body's body's body's body's situation is sufficiently known to a certain extent, it is hard to see that the victim's body's body is faced with the vehicle of the defendant, and as long as it goes beyond the ground, the victim's diagnosis and answer to the hospital."

As such, the defendant is equivalent to the defendant.