On February 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office D in Ansan-si, a member of the Seocho-si, A; (b) “A and B, transfer 173,00,000 won out of the claims based on the Seoul High Court Decision 2010Na117728, which the Defendant had against E; and (c) as follows, entered into a mutual agreement on the transfer of claims between the Defendant and F to facilitate the settlement and termination of the cases of No. 201-type 27690 of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office 201-type 201-type 27690 of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office; and (d) submitted to the competent division of the case as unlawful gains on June 17, 2013 by arbitrarily stating “(decision after the examination of the documents)” using the test-type pent; and (d) submitted it as if it were unlawful.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F (Evidence records 195 pages);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written agreement;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime, the choice of penalties, and the choice of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1148, Apr. 1, 20