2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to confession and reflect by the defendant, there is no particular punishment force for the past 20 years, there is no previous conviction for the defendant as a taxi driver, the vehicle of the defendant at the time was affiliated with the taxi mutual aid association, and the defendant paid 30 million won to the victim at the court below and expressed the victim's intention not to be punished by the defendant. However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant suffered bodily injury to the defendant under the upper part of the frame accompanied by a 18 weeks of non-fel with the victim due to negligence in violation of the signal at night, and suffered approximately 18 weeks of the victim's treatment. In full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the victim's age, character and behavior, environment, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable, and the above argument of the defendant is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.