The defendant has made the best effort to the victims to pay for the damage.

The defendant does not deceiving victims in a planned manner, but did not intend to see that the defendant had been holding an officetel under his/her name, or would have the victim purchase the right of sale and the right of resale only when the statement of the expert in the right of sale and the right of sale and the right of sale.

the victims shall be held liable for the damages.

The defendant paid 30,750,000 won to the victim F, and 2,50,000 won to the victim X, and the victim X wanted to take the defendant first.

As the mother of the defendant is not healthy in old age, the mother of the defendant is faced with difficulties in maintaining his/her livelihood with the detention of the defendant.

In full view of these circumstances, the defendant's prior notice is requested.

2. Examining the Defendant’s age, sex, career, family relation, environment, motive, means and consequence, circumstances after committing the instant crime, and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment in light of various circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.