A. Under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant was in a state of mental disability.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (six years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below as to the claim of mental disability, it is recognized that the defendant was in a drunken state at the time of the crime of this case, but the defendant does not seem to have been in a state of mental disability in light of the details and contents of the crime, the circumstances after the crime

B. As to the assertion on unfair sentencing, there are grounds to consider the Defendant’s sentencing favorable to the sentencing, such as: (a) the rape of the instant case was committed in the attempted attempt; (b) the Defendant did not have the same criminal power; and (c) the Defendant’s reflection.

그러나 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 새벽에 길을 가던 피해자의 머리를 수차례 돌로 내려친 뒤 끌고 가 강간하려다가 미수에 그치고 상해를 가한 것으로 그 죄질이 매우 불량한 점, 이 사건 범행으로 인해 피해자는 머리를 꿰매는 등의 치료를 받았고 정신적 공황장애를 호소하면서 피고인의 엄벌을 탄원한 점 등을 고려하여 보면, 원심판결 선고 이후로 별다른 사정변경이 없는 이 사건에서 양형위원회의 양형기준에 따른 권고형(징역 6년 ~ 9년)의 범위 내에 있는 원심의 양형은 이를 너무 무거워서 부당하다고 보기 어렵다.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.