However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 12, 2018, the Defendant listened to the cruel of the victim C (56 tax) from the victim C at the front of the Pyeong apartment 101 Dong-gu, Pyeong-ro 77, Pyeong-ro, Pyeong-ro, Pyeong-ro, Pyeong-ro, 16:20, the Defendant assaulted the part of the head of the above victim at one time with an Ara pipe (1 meter in length), which is a dangerous object in the vicinity of the chemical.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third public trial date);

1. Application of the witness C’s statutory statement law

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind in sentencing as the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, most of the punishment was imposed only as a minor fine, the defendant's serious drinking, and the defendant's rehabilitation was completed, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, family relation, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.