beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.30 2016고단5672

강제추행

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2016, around 21:13, 2016, the Defendant was faced with the view of the victim D (son, 45 years of age) in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her but her her her her her her

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel submitted by the victim

1. The gist of the argument was that the Defendant was frighten and frighted to see the Defendant’s fright to her with the victim. However, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not intentionally commit an indecent act as to whether her fright to her fright to her see with the victim’s fright to her fright to her fright to her fright to her see, not intentionally committed an indecent act.

2. In light of the following circumstances, at the time of the instant case, the victim was indicted for committing an indecent act by force against the Defendant on July 3, 2016, and continued the first instance trial. The Defendant was found for the purpose of asking the Defendant to the effect that he did not have been subject to indecent act from the victim by attending the trial date and requesting the Defendant to make a statement that he did not have been subject to arrest because he had a lot of criminal records and had been subject to detention. The Defendant had been friendly with the victim before this case, and the Defendant had been friendly with the victim, and the victim was not able to see or refuse this. However, considering the victim and the Defendant’s wife at the time of the instant case, it appears that the victim did not have been friendly with the victim as seen above, and that the victim was able to unilaterally prevent the victim from living together with the Defendant, and considering the situation at the time of the victim’s living together with the Defendant, the Defendant did not appear to have been able to prevent the victim from committing an indecent act.