However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

When the Defendant hedgings with the victim D (math, 19 years of age) and sacrifies, the Defendant tried to threaten the victim with the content that she had sexual intercourse with the victim refers to the persons surrounding the victim, and that she had the body pictures of the victim.

1. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant posted a telephone to E and F, the victim’s seat, regardless of the fact that he did not live with the victim, and even though he did not have any fact, the Defendant told D that “I are a dead person living in the same line with D, and sexual intercourse.” However, D said D said “I want to take the toy, such as a dyp, because it is unnecessary,” and D said D said “I do not have any good person to think of.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Intimidation: (a) the Defendant contacted the victim; (b) the victim did not come to contact; (c) around September 2014, 2014, the victim called “the victim’s body photograph from the telegraph,” and called “packer’s body photograph,” and demanded the victim to talk with the victim as if the victim was in possession of the body photograph of the victim; (d) the victim refused it; and (e) the victim refused it, “I do not know, if you want to do so, within the next week; (e) once you want to do so, I would come to know that the victim would come to know of the inner face; and (e) once you want to drink, I would like to see that the victim would have been frighted to the victim, such as provokinging the body photograph,” and (e) I expect that “I will continue to ask the victim “I do not have to do so during it.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim as if the victim did not take the victim's body photograph as the defendant's intent, such as distributing the victim's body photograph.

Summary of Evidence

1...