If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten or threaten any other person, or cause any danger to traffic by continuing or repeatedly committing any act, among the acts of violation of signal or instruction, violation of speed, speed violation, violation of prohibition against crossing, U-turn, and backward, violation of prohibition against changing a safe distance, violation of prohibition against changing a route, violation of prohibition against changing a route, violation of prohibition against changing a route, violation of prohibition against interference with the preceding route, violation of prohibition against passing ahead of an expressway, violation of method of passing ahead of an expressway, violation of prohibition against crossing, U-turn, or follow-up on an expressway, etc.

Around 10:10 on March 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a enclosed truck and returned to one-lane by C without operating the direction, etc. in order to change the lane to a two-lane; (b) while driving a road near the Jack520 road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road, the Defendant, immediately behind the vehicle of the Defendant, was driving by C in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road in the direction of the road. (c) On the other hand, C entered the two-lane vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the Defendant, without operating the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the first two-lane and the vehicle in the direction of the first three-lane change.

After that, the Defendant continued approximately 300 meters following the above tunnel on the ground that C did not yield the lane to the Defendant’s vehicle as above, and proceeded along two lanes near the E Hospital.

C The vehicle of the defendant was changed from three lanes to two lanes without operating direction direction, etc. in the future, and the vehicle of the defendant was temporarily stopped.

As such, the Defendant committed a violation of the prohibition of changing the course twice and a violation of the prohibition of changing the course once.