2. In light of the circumstances and details of the instant crime, etc., the crime is not less complicated, and the fact that the Defendant was punished due to the crime of drinking alcohol driving in the past, etc. is against the Defendant’s disadvantage, or the Defendant’s violation of the crime, the injury suffered by the victims seems to have been relatively unfilled, and the Defendant appears to have agreed solely with the victim, and the Defendant appears to have agreed solely with the victim, and taking into account the favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s vehicle covered by the comprehensive vehicle insurance, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character, and environment, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too un

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.