A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On December 21, 2017, from around 21:00 to around 01:15 the following day, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the business, “E for the operation of the victim D” in Ulsan Northern-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., the Defendant B interfered with the business of the victim’s main office by force for about four hours, such as: (a) the Defendant B, who was seated on the side table, was on the floor, with a view to the customer who was on the table; and (b) the Defendant A interfered with the victim’s main business by force.

B. At around 01:15 on December 13, 2017, the Defendants of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at the places indicated in Paragraph (1) of this Article, Defendant A requested the head of the police station of the Ulsan Central Police Station, the police box affiliated with the police box of the Ulsan Central Police Station, and the head of the police station H to explain the case from the police box G, and Defendant A demanded the head of the police station G to explain the circumstances of the instant case at issue. Defendant A: “I am feat feat feat feat feat feat feat feat feat, police feat feat feat feat fat feat fat feat feat fat feat fat feat feat feat fat feat fat feat f

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in relation to 112 reporting duties.

2. The defendant A (Bodily Injury) shall be the defendant A-B.

At the time and place of entry in the same paragraph, the victim's g (age 35) g (age 35) ging from the ging of the g (age 35), and the victim was injured by the ging of the treatment days by the ging of the ging part.

3. On December 22, 2017, Defendant B (Indecent act by compulsion) performed alcohol at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around December 22, 2017, the Defendant left the victim’s her son with his own khym with his mind to commit an indecent act against the victim’s main shop D (the victim’s age 47).

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The second protocol of trial: