However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 01:40 on October 11, 2015, the Defendant met the Victim E, who is a senior ward, in the front way of “D” located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul, with a view to what is the reason why the Defendant was unable to have the written motive for the death of Byung.

“Along with the walking distance, a brush was carried out on the ground that the brush was fluenced by the Defendant, and the brush was fluenced by the Defendant, and the head part of the victim was fluent at one time, and the face part was fluenced by attaching approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Entry of the police statement protocol regarding E;

1. Photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on diagnosis and photograph;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Quantity (the distance between pro-Japanese and pro-Japanese victim's fessing shall be roundedly made to his attitude and be taken into account in the motive of committing the crime, the fact that the crime was committed by contingency, the fact that the crime was committed by mistake, mistake, and reflect, and that an agreement has been made with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the preceding conditions shall be considered again);