성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Although the Defendant had sexual intercourse with D on the day of the instant case, the Defendant did not agree to give money in return for sexual intercourse or pay consideration after the date of the instant appeal.
2. The Defendant has the same assertion as the Defendant alleged in the lower court.
The court below rejected the assertion in detail, following the summary of the evidence.
Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and, in particular, the contents of the conversation between the Defendant and D on the day of the instant case (Evidence No. 58-62 pages), in light of the fact that the Defendant and D divides conversations concerning the conditions of sexual traffic, etc., the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case is justifiable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.