When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

After the Defendant was appointed as a police officer on May 12, 1990, from around September 2015 to around September 2015, the Defendant served in the DNA Police Station investigation and custody, and the Victim E (the age of 26) was appointed as a public bond officer around April 2015, and served as the above custody management supervisor around July 2016.

1. On December 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the D police station investigation and detention room located in F on December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (b) followed the victim who was seated in front of the shoulder and read his book; and (c) took the victim’s head by hand from the victim to the string of the victim.

2. On February 28, 2017, around G around 10:46, the Defendant: (a) left the restaurant in G; (b) cut the victim’s shoulder by hand; and (c) laid down the victim’s chests in his/her chests in his/her chests; and (d) laid off the victim’s chests in his/her chests.

3. On March 14, 2017, at the detention room as indicated in paragraph 1, around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) took part in a liver to the victim; and (b) took part in a liver to the victim, and (c) contacted the victim’s chest, who caused the loss, which caused the son’s portrait.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to E;

1. Each police statement made to E (tentative name), I, J, and K;

1. Each statement of L, M, K, and N;

1. Investigation report (related to CCTV images in a detention room);

1.[Attachment] Application of related photographs and ctv video laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime; the choice of each fine under Article 298 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, who is a public official requiring high morality, commits an indecent act by force on three occasions by later female police officers.