업무방해 등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is an employee (production promotion) of K in Y in Y in Yananan-si, the president of the branch of the Korea Metal Trade Union, Defendant B is an employee (production employee) belonging to the above company; Defendant C is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant D is an employee belonging to the above company (production employee); Defendant D is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant E is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant E is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant E is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant E is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant F is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant F is an employee belonging to the above company; Defendant F is an employee belonging to the above company; and Defendant G is an employee belonging to the above company as a representative of the above union.
Defendant
A, C, and E find the Chungcheongnam-nam branch of the Korean Metal Trade Union around January 2008, and receive education on the necessity of the establishment of labor union in K and on the establishment of labor union, and individually contact the employees belonging to the above company with the application for labor union membership, and approximately 60 persons subscribed to the labor union membership.
The Defendants, around March 8, 2008, collected 36 staff members of the K branch of the M Research Institute in the Maan City L, and held an extraordinary general meeting and elected the executive members of the union, including A, the site president B, C, the office director C, the accounting auditD, the head of the organization dispute, E, the head of the education and publicity department F, representatives G, N, andO. On March 10, 2008, the above company was established at the general meeting of the company.
On March 16, 2008, the Defendants demanded the K company to “the approval of a trade union, the provision of a labor union's office, the recognition of a full-time worker, the representative director's meeting, the collective bargaining good faith, and the consent to a labor union for the consolidation of new investment companies employed, etc.” on the part of K company, and decided to collectively refuse to work for overtime work and holiday work which employees ordinarily had in accordance with the labor contract and the rules of employment until then in the event that the above requirements were not implemented as required after maintaining the attitude of 2 weeks of the above requirements.
Defendants are at the end of March 2008.