재요양 및 추가상병 불승인처분 취소 청구
1. The Defendant’s revocation of the disposition of additional injury and disease approval rendered against the Plaintiff on October 13, 2016.
2. The plaintiff's remainder.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 21, 2003, the Plaintiff was a worker who had worked on the Geum River Medal Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant disaster”), and received medical care for an injury or disease, such as superior and superior fresh salt fresh, cresh fresh fresh, cresh fresh fresh fresh, cresh fresh stal, 5-6, and 6-7 on the part of the Plaintiff, while performing his/her duties on April 21, 2003, with the approval of the medical care for the injury or disease, such as the injury or disease fresh fresh fresh sal, spath, chronic external escape, and threphe freg math freg sat freg sat freg sat.
B. (1) The Plaintiff’s measure of non-approval of the additional medical care regarding the “scam escape certificate” No. 5-6 and 6-7 between the following: (a) On May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff’s “scam escape certificate” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”) against the Defendant on May 25, 2016.
(2) On June 1, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for additional medical care with respect to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) as a result of seeking medical advice from a consultant, the Defendant approved non-approval of additional medical care on the following grounds: (b) “The first injury and disease of this case is deemed not a person subject to active medical care because there is no stimulative change in the stimulation of the conical signboard, and there is no special opinion influence other than stitule; (c) there is a significant causal relationship between the previous injury and disease cured or aggravated compared to that at the time of cure; (d) there is no personal cause other than the work; and (e) active treatment, such as surgery, is necessary for the protection of the state; and (e) the first injury and disease of this case, which is expected to have the effect of medical care due to additional medical care.”
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant disposition for non-approval of the instant additional medical care”). 3 The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant request for re-examination but was dismissed.
(c).