If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 3, 2011, the Defendant took the same attitude that the victim F (n, 27 years of age) in C, D, and C, and C, and C, and C, within the "G" entertainment drinking house operated by a mixed person, and the 570,000 won of the share and the share, and the Defendant C, who requested the drinking value, made a heavy bath by raising the victim, and Defendant A and Defendant D had the same attitude that the victim's life and property should be harmed if the victim F (n, 27 years of age) demands the drinking value by putting the above taxes over the side.

In collaboration with C and D, the Defendant, together with the victim as above, forced the victim to have frightened, claiming the drinking value equivalent to 570,000 won, thereby acquiring economic benefits equivalent to the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against D or C;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 2 Subparag. 2 and Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;