B Imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

1. The Defendant: (a) was the owner of the D (Quantity: 1.27 tons; 250 E (Quantities: 0.79 tons; rush; 250 E) and C (250 E) of each coastal fishing vessel registered under his/her name; (b) was the owner of the fish farm E (amount: 0.79 tons; radin, engine macul: 250 E) and the fish farm management vessel E (amount: 0.79 tons); (c) around August 26, 2015, the fact was not found to have depart from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of fishing by using the aforementioned E; (d) was not found to have depart from the Republic of Korea; (e) a report on entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea made with the oil supply card and the certificate of fishery products trade; and (e) a staff member in charge of the fishery industry who was entrusted with duty-free petroleum supply from the said employee; and (e) was supplied with duty-free petroleum at the relevant employee’s 5000 150 K24.

In addition, from around that time to December 19, 2015, the Defendant received a total of KRW 9,933,600,000 of the market price from the injured party, as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes, and received the delivery of KRW 7,300,00 (total of face value 4,334,815).

2. The Defendant B was the owner of each coastal composite fishing vessel H (the quantity: 1.92 tons, engine math: 250 ma) and the fish farm management vessel I (the quantity: 1.1 tons, fuel fuel: 1 ton, engine math: 250 ma) registered in his/her name, and was the owner of each coastal composite fishing vessel H (the quantity: 1.1 ton, fuel for use: 1 ton, engine math: 250 Mao) and the fish farm management vessel I (the quantity): around July 1, 2015, the fact in the hydrobabbane located in the screen relay located in the located in the located located in the located area of the Northwest-gun, the Defendant did not have depart from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of operation by using the above H and I; fishery products were captured, collected, and sold; the Defendant submitted a false report on the supply of free oil and a false entry report on the results of fishery products transaction to the damaged employee.