2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. F business progress 1) The Defendant-affiliated Korea Customs Service and the Defendant are used in combination with the Korea Customs Service for the convenience of understanding. Around February 2011, the Defendant-affiliated Korea Customs Service and the Defendant is used. Around February 2, 2011, EF’s analysis and design work (stage 1 work) is performed (stage 1 work) and development, test, and performance work (stage 2 work; hereinafter “instant project”) is performed from April 201 to January 2014, according to the relevant posters plan. < Amended by Act No. 12720, May 5, 2014 to May 2016.

The scope of the instant project is as follows: (a) the EF shall be referred to as “E System” and (b) the former F shall be referred to as “J System.”

(2) The Plaintiff formed a one-stage service contract (Analysis & design) with the Defendant and E system construction project by organizing G Cooperatives and H joint contractors related to the establishment of the domestic and external linkage and IT integrated management system (iona, performance management system, etc.) through the unification of the stable Korea Customs Service database and standard frameworks, reflecting the process reorganization of the work process to improve the customs administration and cope with the changes in the customs administration environment. On January 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the said project.

B. The public notice of the instant project and the conclusion and performance of the instant service agreement 1) the Defendant, on February 24, 2014, on the basis of the first phase of the project, announced the bidding on the instant project on the basis of the results of the project, and the Plaintiff organized a G Union and a joint venture with I and participated in the bidding alone. 2) The Defendant, in relation to the instant project, disclosed a written request for proposal around December 2013 (the evidence No. 3 and its main contents are as indicated in the attached Table 1), and the Plaintiff submitted a proposal in accordance with the written request for proposal at the time

(A) On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiff prepared a proposal for negotiations on the project of this case with the Defendant on April 22, 2014 (Evidence A and its main contents are as shown in Attached Table 2), and submitted a plan for implementation of the project around May 2014.

A.