However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 5, 2019, at around 23:45, the injured Defendant, within the residence where he was living together with the victimized Party C, who is a friendly son in Masung-si B, and on the ground that the injured was able to change the password of the locker locking device without any justifiable reason and prevented the Defendant from having access to the area, he was booming down the victim’s head head by breaking up on the floor, and kneeing the victim’s face, hume, knee, etc. on the bridge, and inflicted injury on the injured party’s side kneopter inside the right spack, which requires the victim’s treatment for about six weeks.

2. The Defendant causing property damage: (a) on the date and at the place specified in paragraph (1), the victim C changed the password of the lock locking device of the front door and prevented the Defendant from having access to the locking device; (b) on the ground that the victim C was removed from the door locking device of the front door, the door locking device of the city’s aesthetic door in the city was removed from a solid heading act; and (c) on the other hand, the window installed

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement C in court;

1. On-site photographs, the damaged body photographs, the injury diagnosis report, the on-site CCTV image capture photographs, the defendant and the defense counsel did not have any fact that the defendant has taken the victim's face, hnee, knee, etc., and dispute that the victim's face is only the victim's sleper, and that the victim's side knee is not caused by the defendant's assault. However, on November 7, 2019, the victim's police and legal statement, the victim's photograph taken immediately after the crime of this case, and the victim's injury diagnosis document issued by the D Hospital before the crime of this case, which was duly adopted by this court, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the victim's victim's photograph and the victim's victim's injury diagnosis document, etc. before the crime of this case, are not confirmed to have been specially treated by the victim's right slef, as stated in its reasoning.