도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's friendship died due to a traffic accident and took a funeral, and led to the crime of this case in the course of coming back to his home for the company's work, the defendant satising the mistake while making a confession of all the facts charged of this case, and the defendant is in a position to support his wife, pregnant wife and her children. In light of the above, the punishment of imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is deemed to be driven by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol content 0.160%, and the case cannot be deemed to be light. The drinking driving is an offense that may threaten the life and body of others as well as himself/herself, and requires a strict punishment. The Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had the history of having been punished several times due to the same or similar crimes such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., imprisonment, two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment, five times a fine, etc.), and the Defendant committed the instant crime. In full view of all such circumstances as the character, character and environment and environment of the Defendant, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.