beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.06.08 2015고정765

절도등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B’s interference with the performance of official duties is the Defendant’s members of the public transportation labor union D, A is the head of the public transportation labor union D branch D (joint) and E is a company closed on February 28, 2014, and F is a public official in charge of corporate administrative disposition, guidance, supervision, etc. while working in G public transportation and taxi operation.

A On May 31, 2014, at H, at the front road located at H around 10:0, around 10:00, A means that: (a) from the above D’s representative director, who is a public official in charge of taxi affairs at the time, the E and F, the representative director of E and F, the headquarters and workers’ ledger, etc. necessary to certify the corporation taxi number plate and the taxi driver’s career; and (b) transfer them to and depart from the J public transportation and the taxi operating system for bringing them to the J public transportation and the taxi operating system; and (c) the SUV car zone, on which A was on board, is going to go to the E and F, stating, “I Y and workers’ ledger, etc. kept on the back side of the passenger vehicle”; and (d) brings about why and why and how and how to bring them to the above E-UV car.

In other words, the Defendant “hicking to remove” and “hicking to remove,” and the Defendant acted in a manner that seems to interfere with E in front of the E that the Defendant attempted to restrain under A and to interfere with E on the course of his/her ship, and “I wish to see why four documents will be brought about.”

We take part in our country.

"....................."

In collusion with A, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning collection of data necessary for certifying the career of a viewing public official E or F, a closed taxi company.

2. The thief by Defendant A and the thief by Defendant B

A. Defendant A, at the time and place set out in paragraph 1, has a public transport by means of the following: (a) Defendant A, who is a public official in charge of taxi affairs, as described in paragraph 1, from I, the representative director of E and D (joint) closed, who is a public official in charge of taxi affairs, for the identification of corporation taxi number plates and the career of taxi drivers; and (b) J public transport.