학원비 및 강사공탁금 반환
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 7,750,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount from September 16, 2014 to October 23, 2015.
The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also examined.
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant related to Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, C and D, respectively (hereinafter “D”), was operating a cosmetic management room in the name of “F” (hereinafter “private teaching institute”). The Plaintiff is a student of the private teaching institute in this case. B. On January 2, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the Plaintiff’s 1 million won and the Plaintiff’s 40 million won (a half of the qualification certificate, 3 million won, 5 million won, and 5 million won, and 1.6 million won, which were replaced by the Plaintiff’s 5 million won, based on the premise that the Plaintiff had worked in the private teaching institute in this case when acquiring the qualification certificate of the secondary teaching institute in this case between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on the same day, and the Plaintiff was entitled to the Plaintiff’s 5 million won of the tuition fee in this case.
In addition, the manager is also subject to fraud, and the students of private teaching institutes are also subject to fraud.
“The chief of G is also available to the Defendant.”
The relationship between two are inhumanity.
The phrase " was made to the effect that it was".
The plaintiff gives notice of summary order of KRW 1,00,000 on suspicion of impairing the defendant's reputation by expressing false facts.